search_tooltip! X

Sense Tribunal

Zupljanin i Stanisic - "Bosnia and Herzegovina"

Stojan Zupljanin, Mico Stanisic

News 118

THE HAGUE | 12.11.2014.

STANISIC AND ZUPLJANIN: APPELLATE HEARING IN SPRING OF 2015

At the regular status conference in the appellate proceedings in the case against former Republika Srpska police officials it was indicated that an appellate hearing would most likely be held in April or May 2015
THE HAGUE | 24.07.2014.

APPELLATE HEARING FOR STANISIC AND ZUPLJANIN TO TAKE PLACE NEXT YEAR

A status conference was held in the appellate proceedings in the case against former Bosnian Serb police minister Mico Stanisic and chief of the Banja Luka region police Stojan Zupljanin. The appellate hearing will take place in 2015
THE HAGUE | 11.04.2014.

MICO STANISIC WANTS APPEALS CHAMBER TO RECONSIDER DECISION

The defense of the first Bosnian Serb police minister has asked the Appeals Chamber to reconsider the decision to dismiss the defense’s motion to reverse the trial judgment. Disqualified judge Frederik Harhoff was one of the judges who rendered the judgment
THE HAGUE | 09.04.2014.

NOTHING TO REPORT IN STANISIC’S AND ZUPLJANIN’S CASE

A status conference in the appellate proceedings in the case against former Bosnian police minister Mico Stanisic and Banja Luka region police chief Stojan Zupljanin was held today. The decision on the motion to amend the appellate briefs will be delivered in due course
THE HAGUE | 04.04.2014.

MOTION TO REVERSE STANISIC’S AND ZUPLJANIN’S JUDGMENT DENIED

The motion filed by the former Bosnian Serb police chiefs Mico Stanisic and Stojan Zupljanin to declare a mistrial and to reverse the trial judgment because of the alleged bias of Judge Harhoff has been denied. Judge Harhoff sat on the Trial Chamber that found Stanisic and Zupljanin guilty of the crimes committed in 1992
THE HAGUE | 25.02.2014.

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE LIU REJECTED

A panel of judges rejected the motion filed by former Bosnian Serb police officials to disqualify the Chinese judge from the Appeals Chamber set to hear their motion to quash their convictions on the grounds of alleged bias of one of the trial judges
THE HAGUE | 11.02.2014.

HARHOFF AFFAIR AFTERSHOCKS STILL FELT

Three-judge panel, appointed On Monday, will rule on the motion filed by Stojan Zupljanin and Mico Stanisic in which they sought the disqualification of Chinese judge Liu from the Appeals Chamber which is to consider the defense motion to quash the trial judgment in the case against the Bosnian Serb police officials. The defense argues the judgment is unsafe because Danish judge Harhoff was one of the judges in the trial chamber
THE HAGUE | 21.10.2013.

NEW REPERCUSSIONS OF HARHOFF AFFAIR

Stojan Zupljanin’s defense joined the defense of Mico Stanisic, and filed a motion for a mistrial in the case against the former Bosnian Serb police leaders. At issue is the involvement of the Danish judge in the deliberations that resulted in the conviction of their clients: Harhoff was disqualified from the Trial Chamber in another case because of his alleged bias in favor of the conviction of the accused. The defense also called for the disqualification of Judge Liu because he voted against Harhoff’s disqualification
THE HAGUE | 16.10.2013.

‘HARHOFF CASE’ REPERCUSSIONS IN MICO STANISIC’S JUDGMENT

The defense of former Bosnian Serb interior minister Mico Stanisic has filed a motion to the Appeals Chamber to declare a mistrial. In the motion, the defense recalls that the prosecution’s motion for the reconsideration of the decision to disqualify Danish judge Frederik Harhoff has recently been rejected. Harhoff was one of the three judges that convicted Stanisic and Zupljanin
THE HAGUE | 16.09.2013.

PROSECUTION: HARHOFF’S DISQUALIFICATION ERRONEOUS AND NOT FINAL

The prosecution asks the Appeals Chamber to dismiss the motions filed by Mico Stanisic and Stojan Zupljanin to append Judge Harhoff’s letter to their notices of appeal. The letter purportedly shows Harhoff’s bias. According to the prosecution, the decision to disqualify the Danish judge from the Trial Chamber hearing the Seselj case is ‘erroneous, issued in another trial, and is not final’

Cases

Schedule

Until SENSE Center website is launched there will be no new content for the newsletter available.